🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations worked, and revealed fresh requests had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging course since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been obliterated. Following this, Western states exercised their right to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if discussions restart.

The American leader recently stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the conference, designed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war revealed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He said the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had always sought to impose their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the primary solution to address conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this invasion."